27X

I'm sure nvidia's marketing had just as much a hand in a driver roll-out that directly competes with Mantle as their engineers, to be sure; that would be why I mentioned my actual frame differential versus whatever synth benchmark I could throw up via nvidia marketeers and partners.   Regardless, the driver update significantly boosted Skyrim's performance both on my titans in single and SLI, and to a lesser extent on my 580 (5-15 frames), which has a roughly similar architecture, as does the 6XX series, on any GPU dependent processes for any user, that should hold true, as long as there isn't a bottleneck in their respective setups.   It's also worth noting Skyrim has zero Dx10 or 11 hooks or libraries, the dx10 folder in Skyrim only contains installation runtime updates as of the game's release, which said article fails to mention.

  You should, it's pretty much a new standard.  

    :\

Considering I get about a 30 frame difference on on two titans when forcing profile AF through nhancer versus only using ENB, I'd say yes; surprising.   If SoSe uses Downsampling, that would account for getting no difference. Also "application controlled" invokes Skyrim's own AF, which is why folks like Matso and Kyo advise using an external lock and foregoing Skyrim's native AF completely.

  Incredibly terrible advice for any nvidia card with a driver above 320; forcing nvidia native routines and disabling ENB produces about a 50% boost; the ENB uses 100% out of frame calculated values which will destroy performance versus using onboard calculated-per-frame, the Nvidia "magic driver" (337.50)  specifically has built in shader and run time optimization routines specifically engineered for Skyrim that provide up to a 30% boost in full load framerates for anything over a geforce 480, it's literally posted in the patch notes.      

  You need to add a bbp/tbbp animation set like "natural breast animations" to align the referencing back to where it should be, it needs to be after all your other body stuff in the load order.  

  Essentially this.   1. You don't want BGS lawyers involved in any way, shape, or form. They will not take kindly to this site, and it was already a logistical feat tog et modding for Skyrim open, strange how people have seen to have forgotten that. If you want to see mods and modding im TESVI: Elsweyr of the equivalent, you don't want BGS involved, period. If they're more than willing to sue John Carmack and OVR/Facebook over alleged infringing, what exactly do you think is going to happen to a site where you can dl children npcs/followers or turn your pc into a child and then download sexlab and or some beastiality mods. Yeah.   2. 3DM are enabling this, but they're still a third party. The point is to get them understand communication is key, and supporting theft in the long term isn't to anyone's benefit.   3. HDT and three bodies used with SL were made or updated/maintained by chinese users, and the skeleton the current SOS/SL skeleton is based on were originally made by a chinese modder, slamming them in any blanket statement is simply dumb and ignorant.   4. The best weapon is information.