Vaelorian

fejeena already answered your question.

I can teach you how to find out where such things are located. Yes, this is the old "Give the man a fish" metaphor in effect.   First, you need the CS(E). You could do with just the CS, but with the extender it'll bring what you're looking for right to the top of the list. So get it, load it up, set the mod as the active file and let it process.   Now, go to the cell window. It should be on " interiors" (yes, that space is not a mistake). If the mod placed something in one of the game's interiors (such as the mod you mentioned), and you're using the CSE, there should be one (and ONLY one) cell that is highlighted. Double-click it.   Now, sort the objects by type. Find "Container". Find the one that's highlighted, right-click it and hit "View". That should bring you exactly to it, and from that point it should be rather easy to get it.   There are much easier ways to go about this, but this one has the benefit of being simple, and since you probably never touched the CS(E) in your life (otherwise you wouldn't ask where to find a container) I figure it's worth taking another minute of your time in order to make sure the process isn't frustrating.

I've used TESMM for over a year now. It's perfectly stable, has identical functionality (and interface) to OBMM and is better optimized.   I'd like to know why do you dislike it that much, though.

As a rule of thumb, unless you see special "upgrade instructions" for an Oblivion mod it should be safe to simply install the new version on top of your current install.   However, one thing you can (and might want to) do is use Wrye Bash to deactivate the Lovers esm files from your save, deactivate all Lovers mods, load up your game and save. This is what's called a "clean" save, and will now allow the game to properly generate all data from scratch when you re-activate your mods.

*Sigh* MO was built for Skyrim. So was LOOT. Their mod-sorting wasn't designed to work with Oblivion, because Oblivion loads mods based by timestamps. This will cause you issues later on - if you plan on modding Oblivion extensively.   On the other hand, BOSS (better OBLIVION sorting software) was designed to work with Oblivion in mind (surprise, surprise). TESMM allows you to sort mods by hand (which you'll need, 'cause BOSS can't sort everything properly). Wrye will let you play around with the dependencies of mods and saves (which can be invaluable if you want to strip a mod from a CM Partners dependency, for example, or remove an unwanted esm from your save). Wrye also allows you to keep multiple save profiles, to have different mods active in one button (useful, for example, when your family or friends are visiting and you don't want them to see certain mods you have installed).   All of those are very important if you plan to mod your game extensively, and I suggest you get the tools that were actually designed for Oblivion, rather than ones made for a game made years after it and which don't have too much in common script-wise.

Do not use MO for Oblivion; It does not work for it. It never did, and it probably never will unless the programers have a sudden need to add an option to use timestamps to sort your mods.   Instead, use TESMM.

Just wait for a sale if you think the price tag is too high; Skyrim has been on sale multiple times, going as low as 13$ for the legendary edition.

I think it's nothing more than a PR statement; even if the game will be functional, it won't "redeem" them. They need to show some respect for their consumers for that, and I don't think whatever eldritch creature they've conjured to make their business decisions can even comprehend the concept.   So no, I don't think they'll redeem themselves with their next game - or, indeed, any of their games in the next two years at the least.

I suggest using TESMM over OBMM; TESMM was developed from OBMM, has an identical interface, functionality etc - but is significantly better optimized.

  To be honest, no, it does not.

Your request sticks, absolutely reeks of entitlement. Not only are you asking for a project that would take dozens of hours to complete, you're also being rude while you're requesting.   Which, frankly, makes me think you don't understand how this whole "requesting" thing works; see, the modders aren't being paid to make stuff that's requested. They aren't contractually obligated to fulfill requests either. Those modders that do, do it out of their goodwill, and offending them isn't going to make them spend the huge amount of time to make what you want.   I'm not telling you to make the mods you want; I am merely suggesting that you should be civil when you're asking for help.

Use Matchmaker. Still works with the latest build. On-demand - just cast the spell on the desired actors and wait a couple seconds. Zero cool-down time.

I'm not really into any of the pregnancy plugins, but I'm offering to help out of sheer respect for your contribution with Setbody.   I can send you an esp with a couple of characters an... Acquaintance of mine has very generously provided me to do with as I please. However, the characters are exclusively of either the Xenius Race Compilation, Lattamer v3 or Moonshadow Elves race mods.   I'm not much good at identifying head models; so if you think they match, let me know and I'll send you the esp via PM. If not - then I'm afraid I can't help you. Regardless, good luck, -V

I assume you already tried all the tools made by Gerra6, and have had limited success with them? If not, try them. If yes:   Load the pose (import the skeleton with the pose file as keyframe file), target the body and switch to weight-paint mode. Weight-paint until you achieve agreeable results, then switch back to object mode. Clear out the pose and ensure that the model deforms in a reasonable fashion in other poses. If it doesn't, go back to weight-paint mode and re-do it. If it does, export it and you're done.

Can't see that picture.

I have no idea in what language that is. I'm not about to listen to a non-English song, just as I wouldn't ask a stranger to listen to music in a language he doesn't know.   I replied with a lmgtfy link because this isn't the first nor the second time you've asked for something that I clearly stated does not exist; drafts or concepts, last time you wanted a plugin when I clearly stated I was using a prop (and thus a plugin was not required).   Frankly, I'm getting sick of it. So, consider this your first, last and only warning: if you should ever again ask me for a download link to something that I state isn't ready, I will be forced to ask one of the moderators to explain that your behavior is inappropriate - because God knows I've tried on multiple occasions, and you ignored me.   I understand there is a language barrier, but that is no excuse for not learning one simple word over such a long period of time, when I have gone out of my way so many times to point out it's meaning to you.   I am not being unreasonable. I am not asking for something beyond your skills or intelligence. I am asking you to learn one simple word.   To summarize: Please do not reply, quote or interact with my posts in any way, shape or form until you understand what "draft" means.   Good day, sir. -V

  Here animation.

Rough animation draft: -Stage 1, girl on the right fondles the girl on the left's breasts. -Stages 2 & 3, both girls turn their attention to the man on the throne. -Stage 4, undetermined. Possibly the girls kissing right next to the man's member.   The man is a prop. It is not an actor. The animation is intended for two female actors.   Does this sound like an animation people want in their game?   As per usual, I'll leave this post up for a short while before deleting it, should there be no interest.

The hat (and outfit) can be found in DesuChan's "Abbotsford" mod. They're labeled as the "Demon Huntress" set. I believe the above is the white version.

Not with the kind of "removal" I used, apparently, because things seem to be working in order to me. Of course, the problems could just be waiting later on, but those will be dealt with as they come.

I am pretty sure you have, unfortunately; all my suggestions\requests were in the lines of "Perhaps this could use a toggle" and "Maybe an option to allow\disallow this in such and such scenario". At their most demanding in terms of time, they were "perhaps you could allow.. In the event that..." but if Skyrim is anything like any of the scripting languages I've ever dealt with (and I have dealt with quite a few) then most of my requests should have taken no longer than a few minutes.   For example, in this particular scenario, adding a "Never equip hoods" toggle to the MCM menu, which can then be used for every other event which might feature them. A simple addition to the MCM menu, I would imagine - and an even simpler 'if' check.   Regardless; I requested, you declined, and now I will proceed to edit my esp to remove the hood - because frankly if I can't see a girl's face I simply cannot be attracted or aroused by her in any way. And I play my Skyrim primarily as a porn game.   Because I can, -V

This might sound crazy, but I have yet another request for you to (probably) ignore like all the previous ones: Could I persuade you to add a toggle for the hood? I mean, I know you want to lock the player character in as many restraints as possible, but to some (me included) the hood is an extreme turn-off, and it would be rather nice if we could actually see our character's face as she runs around trying to collect keys, rather than a plastic mannequin with a burlap sack on it's face.   You don't have to, of course - it's (as always) your mod and you'll do whatever you please with it, but... It wouldn't take too long to add. And it wouldn't hurt the mod. And it'd be nice of you.

  Only mod I can remember that requires something "special" for use with DMRA is Estrus. If you are using it, the settings scroll should be in the misc tab of your inventory where all the books are. Go to bust size config and change it to DMRA.   It'll still work with HGEC settings, just the hands will clip through the breasts (and if you're using the BBB-enabled animations, they'll clip anyway - just more so with HGEC settings).

Here. Also includes the E-cup version. The archives are unchanged, which means that the model material properties are more than a little odd (for cloth) to say the least. You'll have to change those yourself, should you choose to. Summer Onepiece.7z

I thought I provided sufficient context, but alas - I was wrong; you apparently require more for even such a simple sentence. Alright, let me try to take you through the logic behind this so that you may finally accept that - yes, the way I worded it was in fact correct for my intention.   When you employ the words "highly unstable for inexperienced modders" there is a veiled threat there, but also sufficient context to suggest that - yes, the mod is in fact stable. For how can a mod be unstable only to inexperienced modders?   What I used is called a "scare tactic", and it was used simply and solely for the purpose of keeping new modders away - because who'd like his install to become unstable over this one mod? When someone is ready for Wrye Morph, he won't heed me or he'll see the veiled threat for what it is and ignore it.   On the other hand, when you word your sentence with "unsuitable for inexperienced modders" most will just ignore you, because "How hard can it be?" or they are "Great Skyrim Modders", or possibly just because they "Installed whatever-mod-here on their first try" so they are "definitely ready" for Wrye Morph. And things will go wrong as inevitably as the tide. And they'll come here looking for support.   I have no desire to provide support for Wrye Morph to complete amateur mod-users. That sentence is a "weapon" to "achieve" that goal.   I hope you are satisfied with this answer, for I have not the time nor patience to provide a more in-depth analysis.   Good day, sir.