~magic~

I found the mod to be beyond my expectations and rather amusing, good work.

However, I did notice a lot of spelling and grammatical errors in the dialogue, especially with the dialogue for the guard, which seemed rushed.

Unrelated to the quality of the port -

Am I the only one that is bugged by the plate armor high heels in the armor design? 

That seems to be a bit counter-productive. I don't think the character designers have ever tried to run in high heels.

 

 

 

Facebook will use this to track you some more.

 

There are alternatives that are much better than the casuals rift.

 

I'm positive that this is bullshit, please explain in depth how Facebook has or will have any correlation with the games I play using the Rift. 

 

 

It doesn't. It has no effect on anything but the funding. I have a pre-facebook DK1 and it's worse in every way to the post-facebook DK2. Facebook hasn't even a logo or a "connect to facebook" button on the entire Oculus website. It is independent of Facebook except for funding. 

 

 

Yes they are going to fund it and not use it for spying. 

 

Facebook is not "FREE" Their entire corporate enterprise runs on pure Data collection. 

 

Aside from getting your retina scan, height data and other types of information. Facebook will have access to your entertainment choices. maby even periodic screenshots of what you are viewing.

I hope this post is a joke.

What exactly do you think Facebook is going to do with retina scan and height data?

"Ha! Now that we know your IPD, we can finally advertise clothing that fits! MUAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHA"

Data collection doesn't work on screenshots and personal examination. It works on statistics. Nobody sifts through user data, a program does. There are no human beings in data science, there are only IPs and browsing statistics.

"Lonely Oculus Rift User Screenshot Sorter" would quite possibly be the worst job position imaginable, marginally passing "Professional Old Man's Ballsack Examiner" and "Teenaged Know-It-All Secret Bathroom Camera Specialist".

Paywalling is a bad idea.

Paywalling mods is detrimental to the members - it feels like punishing the average user for the site not having enough money. 

It would simply encourage piracy and never-ending complaints against the site for becoming greedy. Even if it did happen to bring in more revenue, the stress from having to deal with the piracy and complaints would outweigh any extra money made, and people would be begging you to bring back the porn ads and get rid of the paywall.

It would reward people for donating to the site without any detriment whatsoever to normal members. Anyone who wants to whine about some people having a donator tag can fill out a go fuck yourself form and deposit it in the snake-infested complaints box at their earliest convenience.

Some ideas:

-Provide a homepage with featured mods, rather than linking directly to the forums. That is a turn-off for many users.

-Have a "Donate to keep this site running" button somewhere on the header or footer on every page.

They're not great, but they're relatively harmless.

My only upset here is with the ads - period;  but from what I read on page one of this thread - the site can't garner any other type advertising due to the adult nature of the mods (Which is really ridiculous unless all those other products go out of their way to form a reputation of being family oriented or religious).    

Advertising agencies are the some of the most uptight conservative businesses on the face of the planet.

Advertising depends on psychology, and most advertisements are sexual in nature, whether blatant (e.g porn ads) or subliminal (car ads, detergent ads, etc.)  The model behind most of the advertising agencies on the planet is designed by the most uptight conservatives imaginable, which is why advertisements on the internet and television tend to be extraordinarily sexist towards both men and women.

They will absolutely refuse to advertise to anything that even remotely suggests the idea that there is possibly an implied hint towards sexuality in any way, but violence and dismemberment is perfectly fine.

Because if your impressionable kid is going to see something and act upon it, they'd rather have the kid play Grand Theft Auto 5 and go on a killing spree than see sex and *gasp* lose their virginity. 

This even extends to ultra-liberal companies like Google, who have to work with other advertisers that prevent AdSense from being allowed on adult websites.

Just out of curiosity, why does it matter that the sex is real?

Hey, you did a great job on the new version.

I love that I can no longer force bound animations - but I have a new problem.

When I use an armbinder or something of the sort, am in an animation, and press the change animation button that should just cycle to the next animation, it cycles through three or four random animations then settles on one.

This makes it nearly impossible to pick an animation I actually want - random choice with every press of the button is bad enough, but the fact that it changes several times makes it prohibitively annoying.

Is there a way to fix this?

Hi Ashal,

 

i have a suggetion to you.

 

How about adding defloration[hymen break] effect in 1.6 version?

 

like cum effect.

 

for the first time women,

 

of course there will be a option to enable/disable.

 

for reference : http://www.loverslab.com/topic/22243-tesiv-brutal-rape-skin-psd/

 

                       http://www.loverslab.com/topic/16174-vagina-defloration-mod-resource/

Please, let's not. 

http://www.iflscience.com/health-and-medicine/women-suffer-myths-hymen-and-virginity-test

https://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/all-about-sex/201103/the-hymen-membrane-widely-misunderstood

According to what I have seen so far, moderators only close discussions after they devolve into flame wars and hateful banter.

Is there any way to stop the armbinder from restricting normal animations? I hate the bound animations and would like to be able to use non-armbinder animations with it, even if it isn't fully "immersive". 

I remember an old MCM option for disabling the armbinder during sex, but that seems to be missing from the new version.

Is there a way to make Devious Devices or Sanguine's Debauchery let me use any animation even if it means the hands won't look bound at the time?

I hate the bound animations and don't want to use them, but I can't figure out how to disable them.

 

Facebook will use this to track you some more.

 

There are alternatives that are much better than the casuals rift.

 

I'm positive that this is bullshit, please explain in depth how Facebook has or will have any correlation with the games I play using the Rift. 

 

It doesn't. It has no effect on anything but the funding. I have a pre-facebook DK1 and it's worse in every way to the post-facebook DK2. Facebook hasn't even a logo or a "connect to facebook" button on the entire Oculus website. It is independent of Facebook except for funding. 

 

What really pisses me off is that humanity is going nowhere, all these political battles, religion getting in the way of science and science getting in the way of religion why cant these two just coexist and not get in the way of each other?, war, arrogant people, rich companies using planned obsolescence and more money as an excuse for pushing away technologies that are more efficient. I see humanity as a big flaw we weren't meant for this planet, we just sit here and ruin it like a bunch of retards and don't even know it, sitting here in our ignorance thinking everything will be OK but its not. we think that global warming and all these environmental issues are just a hoax when they are not and they are a huge problem and ARE CAUSING DAMAGE. we were given a special gift to live on this planet and to thrive we better fucking not fuck up and actually treat it well or we'll pay a huge god damn price for a bigotry narrow mindedness corruption and stupidity.

 

humans need to wake the fuck up and realize that we are in a primitive state of thinking and need to go beyond that and get to a social and economic stage where we are more acceptable as a race. not this huge shitty mess that we are right now. hopefully we don't dun goof to hard, because it WILL bite us in the ass later.

 

humans are corrupt and fucked up no doubt and our future is fading quickly, at this rate we wont last another 100-200 years in our current state.

 

I blame both religion and politics. 

 

Religion is an outdated relic and whilst we have it, we will never realistically become a space-faring race. Churches don't pay taxes which is millions a year our governments lose for vital projects. People can blindly say god and people won't blink an eye but if you believe in evolution then you have to defend yourself.

 

Oh and the global warming? Apparently all of these campaigns are doing some good; recent research has shown the ozone has regenerated slightly in recent years with our control laws on pollution etc. 

 

Politics are pushing our lands apart. We won't evolve as a race until we get rid of the shackles of country and race and become a united planet. Bigotry is getting worse in the last few years with islam growing exponentially in europe and the US. Muslims come to our countries and demand we live by their ways, instead of becoming part of our society like most people would. People using 'halal' meat to please the muslims is one such gripe. In turn, we become defensive and downright racist. I'm not defending them, they too are racists for saying we live incorrectly when they are the ones supposed to assimilate into our ways. 

 

I can sum up the problems in the world in a few 3-word sentences.

Religions are insane. Politics are outdated. Power is concentrated. Science is denied. 

But are they really problems?

Let's examine these previous sentences and where they come from - 

Religion is insane because it does not pass the test of modern sophisticated and objective thinking.

Politics are outdated because freedom of information and freedom of thought is deteriorating country barriers, exposing the severe flaws and disorganization of modern governments, exposing traditional politics as insufficient. 

Power has always been concentrated, but now there are far too many sources of information, too many cracks, to isolate and indoctrinate a population when it was so easy before - now they must rely on spreading rumors and propaganda through the media, a practice that is weak and unreliable, because the truth is more accessible than ever before. 

Science is denied, when it was ignored before. We are now at an age where scientists lead thought ahead of everyone else - before, a church could merely ignore a scientist and lock free thinkers away so their whistleblowers haven't a chance to speak. Now they must answer to science, they have no choice - they are forced to deny it.

The world isn't good or bad - it is forever neutral. In my eyes, even the threat of people I disagree with winning does not bother me - if religious extremists were to take over and straight up ban everything, I would become a supervillian. Awesome. 

The world is falling apart when your life is falling apart and the world is getting better when you are getting better. Welcome to psychology. 

 

rights for criminals

and what about rights for victims

 

The rights of any person are there for a good reason. How many times did the law fail to capture the real bad guy and lock up an innocent person ?? if you take away that right and you get locked up for somethine you did not commit then come back here and tell how experience was ???

 

For the real bad guys still rights suffice if not how are we any better then other animals ??

 

Not to mention that often, the criminal is not a bad person - the law they broke was made by a bad person.

Today, the 31st, on twitch, 3,000 people watched 30 minutes of 3d printing, then some woman, who angles her webcam directly down her shirt. I really hate the people who support this kind of shit.

Then, she'll start dating some asshole who also values humans based on sex appeal, and all of the nerds that were ogling over her will complain about being friendzoned and assume everything she does is normal behavior for women.

 

People who try to say they love Christmas because they love celebrating the birth of Jesus.

Don't lie.

 

You like the tradition, the pretty lights, the gift wrapping, and, as much as you don't like to admit it, the consumer-farm advertisements and forced shopping holiday. 

 

I don't see these people going to church every Sunday and reading the bible every night. No. Most of them can't even tell me what a synoptic book is, and have no idea what the book, even the new testament, says about women. If you can't even tell me what Sodom and Gomorrah are, don't try to pretend you're all religious and Christian.

Yeah, you can name that thing God did with Jesus, that one good thing. But what about the other fun things you missed? I mean, trying to discuss God and Jesus without knowing about all the fun shit he did is like discussing the Islamic State while the only thing you know about them is that the Al Qaeda doesn't like them. These things are important. 

 

You aren't religious because you're dedicated to worshipping God and Jesus. You're religious because your parents were religious and you celebrate Christmas because your parents celebrated Christmas.

If you bothered to read the Bible, either you would be so religious that the commercialization of Christmas sickens you, or you would become atheist enough to admit that you only like it for the things. 

 

Exactly how I feel about christmas. I've always been an atheist, but it irritates me more than happy christians is the happy christians that say they love celebrating the birth of Jesus. Do they not realise the Catholic church created christmas and put it at the end of the year because it conveniently landed near the winter solstice and Yule? If they realised it, they wouldn't celebrate it because then they'd know it was just a made up holiday to convert Pagans. Closed minded imbeciles. 

 

...Actually, that's a common myth that is not fact at all, and usually propagated by close minded imbeciles. There is little evidence to support the idea that Christmas was created to spite the Pagan holiday, and plenty of evidence on the contrary. Christianity and Paganism coexisted and both took notes off one another - they were not in opposition because of the religious diversity in Rome.

Christmas and the Winter Solstice celebrations coexisted fine, and persisted.  There is no doubt that Christmas and the ancient Yule festivals have similarities - They were both celebrated in the same areas. There is no doubt that Pagan celebrations had a huge influence on Christianity - but there is no evidence whatsoever that Christmas was created to spite Yule. More than likely, it was simply an alternative. 

The conflict between Pagans and Christians came after both celebrations had coexisted. After Christianity was legalized in Rome with the Edict of Malan, the Constantinian Shift happened. Theodosius I made Christianity the ruling religion of Rome, anti-Pagan laws started popping up, Christians were allowed and encouraged to plunder and pillage Pagan temples, and Pagans were forced to convert or be permanently unemployed and face massive social bullying. This marked the beginning of the Middle Ages - but Christmas and Yule celebrations predate this, and come from a time when Paganism and Early Christianity coexisted.

 

zap

 

The only thing that's worse is people who tell others their beliefs are false just to make conversation.

 

 

I suppose it's a good thing I did no such thing, unless you misread what I said. c;

People who try to say they love Christmas because they love celebrating the birth of Jesus.

Don't lie.

You like the tradition, the pretty lights, the gift wrapping, and, as much as you don't like to admit it, the consumer-farm advertisements and forced shopping holiday. 

I don't see these people going to church every Sunday and reading the bible every night. No. Most of them can't even tell me what a synoptic book is, and have no idea what the book, even the new testament, says about women. If you can't even tell me what Sodom and Gomorrah are, don't try to pretend you're all religious and Christian.

Yeah, you can name that thing God did with Jesus, that one good thing. But what about the other fun things you missed? I mean, trying to discuss God and Jesus without knowing about all the fun shit he did is like discussing the Islamic State while the only thing you know about them is that the Al Qaeda doesn't like them. These things are important. 

You aren't religious because you're dedicated to worshipping God and Jesus. You're religious because your parents were religious and you celebrate Christmas because your parents celebrated Christmas.

If you bothered to read the Bible, either you would be so religious that the commercialization of Christmas sickens you, or you would become atheist enough to admit that you only like it for the things. 

The truth is that real sword and axe fighters don't go into battle in a full suit of plate armor. Especially not a female. Those suits can weigh hundreds of pounds and are only suitable on horseback. So anyone not going light, or a bit "skimpy", is the one not role playing and making it far less believable. Not even Arnie would last for a fight with plate armors. Geesh. He'd be too tired and too encumbered to swing a claymore, and then he'd get sliced to bits by a little, skinny guy wearing a light shirt and trousers that could literally run circles around him.

 

Something to ponder, folks. Real sword fighters don't encumber themselves with tons of armor. It would be a death sentence because speed and mobility are what win a sword fight.

I have to burst your bubble here with some points in no particular order. 

1> Plate armor weighed up to, at the peak of the 16th century, in the age of plate armor, 100lbs. That's actually not that much at all. Soldiers in the military have to carry more than that regularly and run with that regardless of their gender. Soldiers completely wore plate armor into battle and on long campaigns.

HOWEVER - You're not completely wrong. Adventurers would have been insane to wear plate armor. See this excellent video on the matter here by scholagladatoria.

2> Strength is equal with equal muscle mass. The disadvantage with being female is the rate at which they build muscle - a female with equal muscle mass to a male has no significant disadvantage in strength, they just have a hell of a time getting there. In Skyrim, the characters have equal muscle mass across genders, so there would be no difference between a female and a male. 

HOWEVER - This does not apply with body mods. CBBE, UNP, Dream Girl, etc. are built to be attractive, unlike the vanilla body in Skyrim. The women using these body mods, which is the assumption if you're using skimpy armor, would have a serious disadvantage in strength. 

3> Plate Armor was not even worn by big hulks of men. It was worn by wealthy fighters. And you can completely swing a claymore with plate armor because martial arts and fencing is not about strength at all, it's about tactic and technique. Yes, doing a big baseball bat swing would encumber you, but you'd be stupid to try that whether you were wearing plate armor or a lace bikini. 

Not only could Arnie use a claymore and fight in a full plate of armor, so could your grandmother. Plate armor was built specifically to be used in battle and improved over centuries to restrict movement and encumber as little as possible. 

A "Real sword fighter" in a skimpy outfit would be at a severe disadvantage. Unlike what you see in Hollywood, you cannot cut through plate armor. You cannot beat it to death. You cannot stab through plate armor. The only way to take on someone in plate armor with a sword is by getting the blade in the cracks in the armor. 

The sad fact is that skimpy armor is completely nonsensical. There is no practical fencing reason to use skimpy armor, except for the long debunked myths about being naked reduces your chance of infection.  

Perhaps, then, for roleplaying, there are economic reasons - making a dress or a full suit of armor is a time consuming and difficult process, and you've got to go kill dragons. So, you slap on the parts that will fit your tiny, frail, feminine body, and go, because the armor that the big men and big nord women are wearing is just too big for your fashion structure. 

I... avoid them. Entirely. This is exactly why I don't wear skimpy outfits.

GOD DAMN. 

These are the kind of animations SexLab needed. The complete opposite of AP. Way to show how it's done.

People on moral High horse bandwagon who say along the lines of "Nude mod? are you a 12 years old teenager or something? get a life/wife lol"

In my experience the people doing that have more nude mods and skimpy armor mods than everything else and try to hide it.

Next time, ask them if you can play skyrim on their computer. Watch the blush.

Everything for the next week. ;~;

 

3J, if I wanted to make individual pages for each animator, (ie, you, 4D, FalloutBoy, Arrok) would that be easily possible?

Sure, that's quite easy to make.

 

thank you so much @3jiou

but it still have problem with the chair and throne

animation work fine but chair and throne did not disappear after switch to the other animation ,it still in there

There's not much I can do other than add yet another final stage with no animobjects attached.

 

Is there any way you can do that? I had to disable the chair/throne animations because of the animobjects staying after the animation. 

I just looked at some of the screenshots, the characters look kind of terrifying

Now that we're done complaining about it, isn't it about time a hero posted a download link?