Request: Nature Rape.

[Scow2]

I for one want more "Human on Animal" beastialty options - not only for rape, but also consensual sex (If that druid mod gets off the ground like I hope it does!)

Maybe a normal human is no match for a troll, sabercat, or werewolf... Unfortunately, I am the high king of Skyrim... but my character is the Dhovakin, DRAGONBORN, and he(And she) should have the strength to force him/herself on anything (s)he has the power to defeat.

[Militus]

I for one want more "Human on Animal" beastialty options - not only for rape, but also consensual sex (If that druid mod gets off the ground like I hope it does!)

Maybe a normal human is no match for a troll, sabercat, or werewolf... Unfortunately, I am the high king of Skyrim... but my character is the Dhovakin, DRAGONBORN, and he(And she) should have the strength to force him/herself on anything (s)he has the power to defeat.

Love it!

 

 

I dig the Flame Atronach/Female Draugr/Spriggan part, not the "male fucking a dog" stuff. Isn't there any way to add those three monster races to the allowed faction for the animations ? I mean come on, they're pretty much humanoid, don't need any specific animation since all we need already exists, and everyone must've thought about banging one while playing as a male character. 

 

 

 

This^

[Militus]

I'm afraid I'll have to shamelessly bump this.

[tase]

Wasn't there a Spriggan remesh/retexture that made her sexy ? Or am I thinking Oblivion again ?

[Militus]

Not sure, haven't seen it myself.

[Militus]

Don't Draugr have the same skeleton as humans?

[Hitom]

" In Medieval times women would often lay with animals when their husbands were off to war or so, as it wasn't considered cheating when it was with an animal. " Wait, what!? Is this true!? for reals!? hahahahaha, that is so awesome and brilliant!

[Militus]

Yeah it is, then again in Medieval times there wasn't nessesarily an age for sex either. Alot of things were  different.

But yeah, it wasn't wrong in the eyes of god or the church then.

[Militus]

http://rule34-data-003.paheal.net/_images/9778941443441085558eb5de48b39e48/1288464%20-%20Nord%20Quick_E%20Skyrim%20The_Elder_Scrolls%20animated%20flame_atronach%20source_filmmaker.gif

Hah!

[Militus]

More shameless bumps? x:

[Militus]

Guess there's just not enough support for women-loving.. I'll stop bumping it then.

[Militus]

http://rule34-data-002.paheal.net/_images/ed1c09eb34a7397d91a19a86e244f749/807202%20-%20Oniontrain%20Skyrim%20The_Elder_Scrolls%20draugr.JPG Just throwing it out there! xP

[Daycrist]

http://rule34-data-003.paheal.net/_images/9778941443441085558eb5de48b39e48/1288464%20-%20Nord%20Quick_E%20Skyrim%20The_Elder_Scrolls%20animated%20flame_atronach%20source_filmmaker.gif

Hah!

 

 

Farkas: Hey Vilkas I found this sexy lithe flame atronarch while I was doing my latest job........but now it burns when I pee should I be worried?

[afa]

Banging a Spriggan sounds like it'll lead a horrible splinter accident. As for Flame Atronach I hope you are high enough in smithing, enchanting, and alchemy to craft some high quality fire resist condoms.

[Daycrist]

Banging a Spriggan sounds like it'll lead a horrible splinter accident. As for Flame Atronach I hope you are high enough in smithing, enchanting, and alchemy to craft some high quality fire resist condoms.

 

Pshhh I'll just leave my boots of Fire Resist on....I'll be fine

[Militus]

http://www.naughtymachinima.com/video/9777/skyrim-werewolves-orcs-and-atronachs Another lovely example..

[FGH001]

Love to see more Human on beast animations!

[therealkarlsquell]

Yeah it is, then again in Medieval times there wasn't nessesarily an age for sex either. Alot of things were  different.

But yeah, it wasn't wrong in the eyes of god or the church then.

 

 

" In Medieval times women would often lay with animals when their husbands were off to war or so, as it wasn't considered cheating when it was with an animal. " Wait, what!? Is this true!? for reals!? hahahahaha, that is so awesome and brilliant!

 

 

 

 

In Medieval times women would often lay with animals when their husbands were off to war or so, as it wasn't considered cheating when it was with an animal. While this again goes for animals being dominant, I think top guys (who like to do the fucking,clearly) should also be able to be humping. I'm sure there's some form of female werewolf out there that can be humped, things like that.

 

 

 

 

Boy i really dont know where or whom you got these informations from but whatever never believe in anything that comes from that source ever again. EVER. No discussion just believe me.

[Eryneth]

First of all: Nobody needs to explain themself because of their fetish, so don't worry.

 

I needed to quote this and vote this as the LL moto

[Eryneth]

 

Yeah it is, then again in Medieval times there wasn't nessesarily an age for sex either. Alot of things were  different.

But yeah, it wasn't wrong in the eyes of god or the church then.

 

 

" In Medieval times women would often lay with animals when their husbands were off to war or so, as it wasn't considered cheating when it was with an animal. " Wait, what!? Is this true!? for reals!? hahahahaha, that is so awesome and brilliant!

 

 

 

 

In Medieval times women would often lay with animals when their husbands were off to war or so, as it wasn't considered cheating when it was with an animal. While this again goes for animals being dominant, I think top guys (who like to do the fucking,clearly) should also be able to be humping. I'm sure there's some form of female werewolf out there that can be humped, things like that.

 

 

 

 

Boy i really dont know where or whom you got these informations from but whatever never believe in anything that comes from that source ever again. EVER. No discussion just believe me.

 

 

How about we don't "just believe you".... Pfft... "No discussion" = no proof.

 

"The practice of bestiality was most widely accepted during the Middle Ages (476 AD to 1492 AD) due to the low level of acceptance of the Christian church in Western society (Miletski, 2006)"

 

https://inpress.lib.uiowa.edu/feminae/DetailsPage.aspx?Feminae_ID=9713

 

Heres another few books you might like to read:

Pierre Payer, "Sex and the Penitentials"

Vern Bullough, "Sexual Practices and the Medieval Church"

Uta Ranke-Heinemann, "Eunuchs for Heaven"

 

Bestiality was generally accepted in areas until the introduction of the Christian church, in rural areas in that particular time it would have been quite prevalent but more accepted than todays society with rural society back then still having Druidic and Pagan views, in particular nature worship.

 

If you don't want to enter into a discussion on something don't walk into a thread, crap all over a statement that someone has made and then claim that everyone should "just believe you".

[Militus]

^This man is a legend.

[Kelinas]

If you're looking for mods where you take a more dominating role in the nature, can't go wrong with Untamed, really. You basically turn into a one woman apocalypse after humping your way through the various animals. I'm not sure if you get anything special beyond Untamed levels when it comes to the less animal animals like Atronochs or Draugr or Giants and so on, but the main thematics is focused on wolves, saber cats, bears and so on.

[wysiwyg]

I like dominant female anything personally.

 

There will be nothing but snowstorms until The Dragonborn gradually brings back Spring by letting every spriggan have her way with him! :-p

 

You'll need to be absolutely immune to fire to survive the upcoming trials! Fortunately, I know a lonely fire atronach who is willing to deal...

[therealkarlsquell]

But yeah, it wasn't wrong in the eyes of god or the church then.

 

First sorry if my english isnt fit for these kind of posts, might switch to german for single words or phrases i am unable to express in english.

I was just refering to this statement. With a little basic understanding of christian sexual morality u have to know that this aint true .... cant be true. Thats why i rigourosly said its beyond the boarder where a discussion of anykind seems usefull.

 

 

ow about we don't "just believe you".... Pfft... "No discussion" = no proof.

 

"The practice of bestiality was most widely accepted during the Middle Ages (476 AD to 1492 AD) due to the low level of acceptance of the Christian church in Western society (Miletski, 2006)"

 

https://inpress.lib....Feminae_ID=9713

 

Heres another few books you might like to read:

Pierre Payer, "Sex and the Penitentials"

Vern Bullough, "Sexual Practices and the Medieval Church"

Uta Ranke-Heinemann, "Eunuchs for Heaven"

 

Bestiality was generally accepted in areas until the introduction of the Christian church, in rural areas in that particular time it would have been quite prevalent but more accepted than todays society with rural society back then still having Druidic and Pagan views, in particular nature worship.

 

 

 

So now to the books u are putting forward to underline the statement that bestiality of any kind was acceptable in terms of christian sexual morality. I cant find anything on Miletski so i am unable to comment on her, but the statement itself seems odd: it was commonly accepted because chritian church wassnt widely accepted? Do i read this right? Well if so, its again beyond the point any discussion of this theory would make sense .... if not pls enlight me what she meant by this.

 

The book u linked states itself that bestiality was "belegt" with death sentence by the time of the 13th century. All she claims there is that ancients had a laisse fair attitude towards this and can only explain that she is referring to pre medieval times here.

I actually happen to know the Payer book and dont remember he is putting forward any argument stating that human-animal intercourse would have been acceptable in medieval. I actually dont remember he had bestiallity on its table anyhow. But as he is reffering to "Bußbüchern" anything he might have been writing about bestiality might have been reffering to the canonic laws given on the "Synode in Ankara (damals Sebaste)" about 320 where bestiallity was concidered a punishable crime (pre medieval).

 

Actually the Book of Vern Bullough is completely on my line of argumentation, yet again on various places stating, that sexuality that where not for the purposes of procrastination where considered sinfull in general. Plus stating that bestialic intercourse was often associated with herasy and witchery.

Didnt find anything for Heinemann.

 

 

If you don't want to enter into a discussion on something don't walk into a thread, crap all over a statement that someone has made and then claim that everyone should "just believe you".

 

As i said the statement was beyond the boarder it is usefull for a discussion (quite like the one who said the medieval invented like 300 years wich had never really happened) and anyone who had just the most basic knowledge of christian sexual moral would ve known this on the first glance. So i didnt mean to crap over someones statement, i just warned him to take serious the sources where he had that from, because he obv. doesnt have such knowledge (which istn any sort of offense) and is therefore an easy victim for such "unhaltbare" Statements.